They used their priests to ask their question and listen to the answers through signs.
Romans just like Greeks believed in religion and attached great importance to it. Just like the Greeks, they were polytheistic, they believed that their gods were responsible for their creation and controlled their lives. Romans classified religion in to state religion and household religion Spielvogel, Household religion involved worshipping the gods that protected the family and house.
Roman houses contained a sacred place regarded as altar where every family prayed to the gods each morning. Just like the Greeks, The Romans believed in gods and goddess that they believed controlled everything in life from killing for food to falling in love. Just like the Greeks, Romans honored their gods and goddesses by building grand temples.
They also offered animal sacrifices to the gods and gave them gifts that they thought would please them. They believed that if the gods were happy with them, they would in return receive good luck but if they were angry with them, something would go wrong. City-states were many small areas sub-dividing the state. The mountainous ecology of Ancient Greece separated the city-states making it very difficult to travel from one city-state to another. Everyone believed that their city-state was better than the other was although they all worshipped the same gods and had similar traditions.
Initially a few wealthy men ruled the city-states before a government system was introduced. Each city-state had its own government who ruled through democracy. The democratic government allowed people to rule and to vote for their leaders. Athens subdivided their people in to three classes; the upper class that consisted of male citizens born in Athens, middle class consisted of male citizens not born in Athens while the lower class consisted of slaves.
Voting in ancient Greece took place in public assemblies and only males born in Athens voted. The upper class group discussed the laws that benefited ancient Greece but not the middle class or lower class. Ancient Rome was an empire that had emperors as the leaders. Just like Greece, a government headed by an emperor ruled Rome. The power of the government in Rome was balanced between three branches; the executive, the legislative and the judicial Guaitoli, The executive branch consisted of two leaders consuls , elected by the upper class to serve for one year.
Their role was to order Roman army during wars and supervise the senate. Mayors, tax collectors, city police among other superior person in cities formed part of executive branch. The senate consisting male citizens who owned the land formed the legislative branch. The men appointed by the consuls controlled the consuls by telling them how much to spend and on what activities.
The judicial branch consisted of six judges that decided on the punishments the criminals would receive. In Rome only adults had permission to vote and just like the Greek system, males who owned the land could only do amendment or criticize law. Men, women and children had different roles and responsibilities in Greek and Roman culture. Chitons showed the man status in the society specifically through the decoration. The men mostly worked as farmers or businesspersons during the day and demanded great respect while at home. Men were the ones in charge of the house and the family. Women and children in Greek culture did not eat in the same room as men.
The slaves fed and entertained men during dinner as they lay on couches. Women on the other hand were not given much responsibility, they were not allowed to go to Olympics, visit the city or even eat or sleep in the same room as men. Their work was to run the household, have children and manage the slaves if they were wealthy and if not work the fields. Men in Roman culture were the masters of the family and the house.
They worked during the day and socialize with other men in the afternoon and evenings.
Essay for comparison and contrast
Men in Roman culture had different roles depending on whether you were rich or poor. The man main role was to provide for his family. Women on the other hand took care of the household and children. Women in Roman culture were not too restricted as some could hold jobs such as teaching.
Ancient Rome Essay | Bartleby
Greeks and Romans portrayed many similarities in their religion beliefs and rituals. Both cultures were polytheistic, believing in many gods and goddesses. Both cultures also believed that the gods and goddesses controlled everything in life from creation, their lives and everything that goes on. Greeks and Romans believed their goods were very powerful and that they gods took care of them both when they were living and when they died. Both Greeks and Romans believed in intellectual activity of religious rituals.
Both cultures honored their gods and goddesses by offering animal sacrifices. Both Greeks and Romans built beautiful temples where they used to pray and offer sacrifices to their gods and goddesses. Roman believed that gods would show a sign if they were happy and they were unhappy something bad would happen. Both cultures had many gods and goddesses with each god or goddess having a specific role to play or a specific place to control.
Despite having so much similarity in the religion, Greeks and Romans also have some differences in their religious beliefs. Although both cultures believed in gods and goddesses, they had named them differently. Greeks believed that their gods and goddesses live on Mount Olives Sansone, whereas Romans did not have a specific place where all their gods and goddesses lived. Greeks religion was not classified while Roman classified their religion as either state region or household religion.
Writing an Outline. It helps you to organize your thoughts and arguments. A good outline can make conducting research and then writing the paper very efficient. Your outline page must include your :. So an Introduction gives an overview of the topic and your thesis statement. In the conclusion, you summarize what you have told your reader.
Following are 3 sample outlines, from actual student papers. Remember that a good outline makes writing easier and more efficient.
Sample Outline 1. Title: Frederick Douglass. Douglass as Lecturer. History as slave and acquisition of education. Early lectures, including initial speech before Garrison. Effect of lectures on society. Garrison set-back and significance. Significance of Paper. Douglass as Politician.
- skills gained from writing a thesis.
- mphil international relations thesis?
- Essay on Livy’s The Rise of Rome?
- Life in ancient greece essay conclusion?
- Similar Topics;
- Essays on Julius Caesar.
Key trait for success. Goal of political activism. Efforts for Republican party. Black soldier enlistment crusade.
How to Write a Strong Conclusion Based on the Outstanding Essay Conclusion Examples
Joining of Republican party. Summarize arguments and efforts. Sample Outline 2. Thesis: The Federalist Papers influenced the ratification of the Constitution by making some of their most important arguments, including the importance of being in a Union by having a Constitution, answering to the objections made by the Anti-federalists about separation of powers, and defending opposing arguments made against the characteristics of the executive and judicial branch as provided in the Constitution.
Describe The Federalist Papers are and when they started. State when The Federalist was printed and published. Discuss the intentions and purposes of The Federalist. Argument for the benefit of a Union. A Union would guard against external dangers. A Union would guard against internal dangers. Federalist Argument of the problem with complete separation of powers. Anti-federalists wanted a complete separation of the judicial, executive, and legislative branches. The Federalist said the maxim of complete separation of powers is misunderstood.
The branches need some limited power of the other branches to protect themselves from encroachment of the other branches Federalist The branches need to have the interests of maintaining their powers, and not letting the other branches take that away.
Argument for a single executive, and against a plural executive. It would take too long for the people in the executive position to make decision in an emergency, because they might disagree. In a plural executive, it is hard to tell who is responsible for a wrongdoing because they can all blame each other, so a single executive would lead to more responsible behavior.